![]() So I was a Cubase user for years and years, and didn't even know Reaper existed. ![]() you should download and try both and make up your own mind. It's just the circle of fifths.Īnyway, that's my opinion. Very intuitive and fast.Ī lot of people talk about the chord finder like it's some kind of magical tool that will help you write music. In Reaper, all these functions are available from the mouse. In Cubase, it's three separate key strokes to insert, edit and delete MIDI notes. The simplest example to demonstrate the difference: I don't know who designed Cubase's system - but that person is not me. My method of working is the fastest for me. ![]() In Reaper I can use the radial menu to drop all sorts of chords, arpeggiate things and a whole load of stuff that I need to do. Extremely inefficient, and it feels like wearing a straight jacket compared to Reaper. Today entry-level users get more processing power than only professionals had earlier.I think the people who say this basically grew up with Cubase so have internalized that as the 'right' way to do stuff.įrom my perspective, Cubase's MIDI was average at best. Music software has also developed according to Moore's Law from pure midi in Cubase in the 80´s to full digital workstations with audio processing quality at a fraction of the price. It clearly can not continue for the next 30 years. The number of transistors on a CPU has developed from a few thousand in 1971 to over 7 billion on an intel i9 processor and it will probably continue for some years. The law states that the number of transistors in a processor doubles every 2 years. Moore's law is a theory by Gordon Moore that predicts microchip development. New CPUs are launched every quarter and this article will be updated along to keep it updated as much as possible. The i9-9900K, i9-9900KS, or Ryzen 3900X are at the moment great choices for a music production computer upgrade. If you have an older central processing unit that scores around 8000 to 12000 points in this CPU list you might benefit from a CPU upgrade but it probably also goes for Motherboard, Cooler, and RAM. DAW Benchmarkĭ has templates and software made for DAW benchmarking with your music software. If you are struggling with UH-e Diva or Repro the 9900KS is your choice. Though AMD is closing the gap The 9900KS til has slightly better core rating compared to the 3900X model but the AMD Pro 3900 beats even 9900KS.įor crunching heavy plugins 9900KS is slightly better but the 3900X has 10.000 extra points from the 4 extra cores for a higher track count in your production projects. ![]() The 3900X scores over 10.000 points more than the 9900KS but that does not take core rating in account. 9900KS has a better single-core rating but 3900X has more cores.ĬPU Mark is a relative benchmark score that can be compared between CPUs listed in the chart. There is a new 9900KS model with slightly better performance. Recently AMD has made a lot of progress and even overrun Intel on Core count.įor some time the Intel I9 9900K has been a good choice for digital audio workstations and still is. The best is off cause lots of fast cores but if you use many software instruments and heavy plugins Single Thread Rating is important.įor many years Intel has been ahead of AMD with the best CPU's making faster and more reliable CPUs. Lots of tracks and plugins require more cores.Heavy software algorithms require core performance and lots of tracks require lots of cores. The number of samples is shown as a reference when you click on it. The best price/performance is usually a little down the CPU benchmark list.īest CPU for music production?. Since all new CPUs have 8+ Cores the best CPU is probably one with a high Single-Core Rating and might be found at the top of this list. Hyperthreading is a technique where the operating system sees 2 cores that can run virtually simultaneously. 2 logical cores per core means Hyperthreading. The number of physical single cores followed by a logical cores specifications.The most important specifications on the Ryzen 3900X in the chart above are: The yearly running cost might also be estimatedĪMD Ryzen 3900X specifications CPU comparison chart.Watt Usage listed as Max TDP (measures the power consumption).Download a file and start it to participate in collecting anonymous statistical results. You can run your own benchmark on CPU userbenchmark website. CPU specifications might seem like nonsense but it is not that hard to get the basics before you purchase the wrong central processing unit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |